Drawing for THE AD NETWORK

USPTO serial 78217142

THE AD NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE AD NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward H. Rosenthal

EDWARD H ROSENTHAL FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ PC488 MADISON AVE 9TH FLNEW YORK NY, 10022U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Cable and satellite television broadcasting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 13, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 13, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 17, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 30, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 24, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2003PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance