USPTO serial 78217336
ACOUSTILINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3059935Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 21, 2006
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACOUSTILINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ENTWICKLUNGSGESELLSCHAFT FUR AKUSTIK (EFA) MIT BESCHRANKTER HAFTUNG
WITTEN, DE
Other trademarks owned by ENTWICKLUNGSGESELLSCHAFT FUR AKUSTIK (EFA) MIT BESCHRANKTER HAFTUNG
Witten, DE
Witten, DE
Witten, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C. Purdue
DAVID C PURDUE PURDUE LAW OFFICES2735 N HOLLAND-SYLVANIA RD STE B-2TOLEDO OH, 43615U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Structural parts for automobiles, namely, textile wheel arch shells, underside shields, interior roof liners, side linings and interior rear shelf panels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Automotive hood insulations, automotive bulkhead exterior and interior insulations, automotive front floor insulations, automotive middle floor insulations, automotive seat well insulations and automotive bulkhead top and seat well insulations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | Floor mats for vehicles; carpets; automotive trunk floor linings; automotive trunk cover linings and side linings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ENTWICKLUNGSGESELLSCHAFT FUR AKUSTIK (EFA) MIT BESCHRANKTER HAFTUNG
- Other trademarks owned by HP-Chemie Pelzer GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by HP-Chemie Pelzer GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by HP-Chemie Pelzer GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named ACOUSTILINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |