USPTO serial 78217446
CERTIFIED LONGEVITY PLANNER (CLP)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 24, 2004
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CERTIFIED LONGEVITY PLANNER (CLP)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Institute for Certified Longevity Planners, Inc.
Naples, FL
Other trademarks owned by Institute for Certified Longevity Planners, Inc.
Institute for Certified Longevity Planners, Inc.
Naples, FL
Other trademarks owned by Institute for Certified Longevity Planners, Inc.
Institute for Certified Longevity Planners, Inc.
Naples, FL
Other trademarks owned by Institute for Certified Longevity Planners, Inc.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | Financial Planning and Advisory Services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 3, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Institute for Certified Longevity Planners, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Institute for Certified Longevity Planners, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Institute for Certified Longevity Planners, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class B
- Similar marks named CERTIFIED LONGEVITY PLANNER (CLP)
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |