Drawing for Serial No. 78217598

USPTO serial 78217598

Serial No. 78217598

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78217598?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stanley C. Macel, III, Esq.

STANLEY C MACEL III ESQ CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPPO BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, artificial coffee, honey, treacle, salt, mustard, vinegar, sauces, spices, flavoring syrups, natural and synthetic aromatic flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes, flavorings for tobacco, food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or filler, non-essential oil food flavoringsACTIVE—
032Beers, mineral and aerated waters, nonalcoholic drinks, namely, soft drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juices, syrups for making fruit drinksACTIVE—
033Alcoholic aperitif bitters, alcoholic beverage produced from a brewed malt base with natural flavors, alcoholic bitters, alcoholic coffee-based beverage, alcoholic malt coolers, alcoholic punch, alcoholic tea-based beverage, aperitifs with a distilled alcoholic liquor base, prepared alcoholic cocktailsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 21, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 21, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance