Drawing for ON-RAMP

USPTO serial 78218420

ON-RAMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2936868Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 29, 2005
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ON-RAMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara L. Friedman

SUSAN E HOLLANDER MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP1001 PAGE MILL RD BLDG 2PALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Arranging and conducting both live and web-based seminars, workshops, programs, and classes on the use of computer software for managing inventory, sales, finance, insurance, parts, services, and accounting for automotive and truck dealership employees; distribution of course materials in connection therewith; arranging and conducting both live and web-based professional development courses for automotive and truck dealership employees; distribution of course materials in connection therewith; computer education training for automotive and truck dealership employeesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJul 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2010C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Mar 8, 2010C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Mar 8, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 8, 2010ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 16, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 30, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 30, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance