Drawing for LM500

USPTO serial 78218698

LM500

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LM500?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine Mennenga

CATHERINE MENNENGA GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY3135 EASTON TPKEFAIRFIELD CT, 06828U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Marine vessel propulsion engines; gas turbines for mechanical and electrical drivers; gas turbine motors and engines for marine vessals; gas turbine for power generation; engine and motor driven steam and electric generators; engines for the generation of electricity; start motors not for land vehicles; all of the foregoing good not for use in connection with wind-generated energy; Engines and structural parts therefore, for marine vessels and machinesACTIVE—
037Repair, replacement, overhaul and maintenance services for gas for marine vessels and machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 26, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 21, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance