USPTO serial 78218728
REACH PASSION CONNECTED PROVEN CREATIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REACH PASSION CONNECTED PROVEN CREATIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tarrytown, NY
Tarrytown, NY
Tarrytown, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marsha G. Ajhar
Marsha G. Ajhar SMITH GAMBRELL & RUSSELL LLP1301 Avenue of the AmericasNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES RELATING TO OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ASSISTING CUSTOMERS IN THE CORRECT USE OF COLOR AND ADDITIVE MASTERBATCH PRODUCTS AND SOLVING PRODUCTION, FINISHED PRODUCT, OTHER CUSTOMER SPECIFIC PROBLEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MANUFACTURING OF PLASTIC GOODS, NAMELY, INGREDIENT FORMULATIONS, COLOR MATCHING, PROCESS CONDITIONS, AND OPTIMIZING USE OF COLOR AND ADDITIVE MASTERBATCH PRODUCTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF ENGINEERING PLASTIC GOODS, NAMELY, INGREDIENT FORMULATIONS, COLOR MATCHING, PROCESS CONDITIONS, AND OPTIMIZING USE OF COLOR AND ADDITIVE MASTERBATCH PRODUCTS; RESEARCH INVOLVING PROPRIETARY BLENDS OF ADDITIVES, RESINS AND PIGMENTS TO PRODUCE UNIQUE OR IMPROVED COLOR AND ADDITIVE MASTERBATCHES FOR THE PLASTICS INDUSTRY; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COLOR, BLACK, WHITE AND ADDITIVE CONCENTRATES AND COMPOUNDS FOR PLASTIC APPLICATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ampacet Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Ampacet Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Ampacet Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REACH PASSION CONNECTED PROVEN CREATIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |