USPTO serial 78219419
KOMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KOMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | JUICE MACHINES; ELECTRIC FOOD PROCESSORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | VENDING MACHINES FOR DISPENSING FOOD AND BEVERAGE AND STRUCTURAL PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | MACHINES FOR MAKING AND BREWING COFFEE AND FOR DISPENSING COFFEE AND HOT WATER, HEATED BEVERAGE DISPENSING UNITS, REFRIGERATED BEVERAGE DISPENSING UNITS, ELECTRIC COFFEE PERCOLATORS, ELECTRIC COFFEE MAKERS, AND STRUCTURAL PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFORE | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | SYRUPS AND NON-ALCOHOLIC FRUIT EXTRACTS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF SOFT DRINKS AND ESSENCES NOT BEING ESSENTIAL OILS FOR MAKING NON-ALCOHOLIC, NON-CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING NON-ALCOHOLIC THIRST QUENCHING BEVERAGES, SPORTS DRINKS AND FRUIT DRINKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named KOMO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |