USPTO serial 78219738
T.I.E.S. TAKING INTERNET EDUCATION SERIOUSLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with T.I.E.S. TAKING INTERNET EDUCATION SERIOUSLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett A. August
BRETT A AUGUST PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO IL, 60606U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | education services, namely conducting classes, seminars, workshops and lectures for schools, law enforcement agencies, parents and children in the field of safe use of the Internet by children | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |