USPTO serial 78219917
THE ZOO COLLECTION BY KID GENIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE ZOO COLLECTION BY KID GENIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donn K. Harms
DONN K HARMS AMERICAN PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW CENTER12702 VIA CORTINA STE 100DEL MAR CA, 92014U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, namely, action toys, bathtub toys, construction toys, pet toys, plush toys, ride-on toys, sandbox toys, squeeze toys, wind-up toys, musical toys, crib toys, crib mobiles, stuffed toy animals, children's multiple activity toys, adults' and children's party games, all types of dolls, doll accessories, climbing units, children's play cosmetics, card games, role playing games, board games and card games for teaching of alphabet, math, music, and language, and, adult and children's sporting goods, namely, playground balls, beach balls, basketballs, baseballs, baseball bats, baseball mitts, ball hoops and fishing rods. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |