USPTO serial 78219988
MILWAUKEEJOBS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILWAUKEEJOBS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret M. Serrano, Esq.
MARGARET M SERRANO ESQ PLANBRAND LLC2821 E OKLAHOMA AVEMILWAUKEE WI, 53207U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | EMPLOYMENT HIRING, RECRUITING, PLACEMENT, STAFFING, AND CAREER NETWORKING SERVICES; PROVIDING ONLINE LISTINGS OF COURSE OFFERINGS IN THE FIELDS OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, CAREER ADVANCEMENT, AND MATTERS OF INTEREST TO WORKING PEOPLE, NAMELY, SKILLS ANALYSIS, TRAINING, ASSESSMENT AND CERTIFICATION VIA THE INTERNET; PROVIDING OFFLINE AND ONLINE INTERACTIVE EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION, DATABASES AND SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, CAREERS, CAREER DEVELOPMENT, CAREER COUNSELING, LIFESTYLE, UNEMPLOYMENT RATES, SALARY COMPARISONS, EMPLOYMENT RESOURCES, SERVICES OF INTEREST TO PEOPLE WHO RELOCATE, EMPLOYMENT LISTINGS, RESUMES, EMPLOYMENT COUNSELING SERVICES, PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT SERVICES, RESUME CREATING, RESUME POSTING, RESUME AND EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION TRANSMITTALS AND TRANSMITTAL OF RESPONSES THERETO, AND RESUME MATCHING SERVICES DESIGNED TO MATCH RESUMES WITH EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES LISTED BY EMPLOYERS AND TO FACILITATE CONTACT BETWEEN PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYERS; ADVERTISING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF EMPLOYMENT; PROVIDING ONLINE INFORMATION, INTERACTIVE TOOLS, AND ADVICE ON RESUME CREATION AND SERVICES RELATING TO THE POSTING OF RESUMES AND THE MATCHING OF RESUMES WITH EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES LISTED BY EMPLOYERS; BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, SUPPLYING INFORMATION TO PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYERS ON EMPLOYMENT CANDIDATES OBTAINED BY SEARCHING RESUME DATABASES ON THE INTERNET; PROMOTING, ADVERTISING AND MARKETING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE INTERNET; TEMPORARY, PERMANENT, AND CONTRACT EMPLOYMENT AGENCY, PLACEMENT, AND HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PERSONNEL SEARCH, SCREENING, SELECTION, AND RECRUITMENT SERVICES; ON-LINE ASSESSMENT AND PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING OF CANDIDATES FOR EMPLOYMENT | ACTIVE | Feb 17, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |