USPTO serial 78220033
FREEDOM FRIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FREEDOM FRIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saint John, CA
GRAND FOREST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
DIEPPE, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Other trademarks owned by GRAND FOREST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
GRAND FOREST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
DIEPPE, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Other trademarks owned by GRAND FOREST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P. Scott Maclean
PATRICIA A WILCZYNSKI BROZEK WILCZYNSKI BROZEK LAW40 PRESTON ST PO BOX 1830HUNTINGTON, NY 11743UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen french fried potatoes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Irving Pulp & Paper, Limited, operating through its Cavendish Farms Division and trading as Cavendish Farms
- Other trademarks owned by GRAND FOREST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by GRAND FOREST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named FREEDOM FRIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |