USPTO serial 78220283
CLOSETMAID TOGETHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLOSETMAID TOGETHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.
JOSEPH E WALSH JR HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE7700 BONHOMME STE 400ST LOUIS MO, 63105U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | A full line storage and organizer products, shelving systems, shelves, storage racks, storage carts, storage chests; storage cabinets, closet organizers, bathroom organizers, boot and shoe organizers, wardrobes, underbed organizers, utility cabinets bookcases, media storage units, desks, furniture, namely, kitchen furniture, bedroom furniture, bathroom furniture, dining room furniture, utility room furniture, laundry room furniture, workshop furniture, and office furniture, hutches, drawers, cabinet units, drawer units, drawer systems, drawer frames and framesets, mounting, support and assembly hardware, hanger bars, bar supports, bar connectors, bar endcaps, bar adapters, wall brackets, wall clips, support brackets, shelf clips, shelf supports, shelf connectors, shelf end caps, shelf adapters, shelf dividers support poles, standards, tracks, mounting rails jointer plates, hooks, trays, racks, drawer stops, casters, caster breaks, floor locks, canvas organizers, baskets and basket systems, hampers, shelf dividers, trash bag holders, trash bog hangers, storage bins, drawer organizers, beverage can dispensers, portable closets, garment racks, laundry carts, totes, office accessory organizers, closet accessory organizers, bedroom accessory organizers, bathroom accessory organizers, kitchen accessory organizers, pantry accessory organizers, garage accessory organizers, laundry accessory organizers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |