USPTO serial 78221055
TECH-LOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3212169Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 27, 2007
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TECH-LOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Bushnell
Robert E. Bushnell Robert E. Bushnell & Law Firm2029 K Street, N.W., Suite 600Washington, DC 20006-1004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRICAL UTILITY AND BATTERY-OPERATED POWER TOOLS, NAMELY, IMPACT WRENCHES, DRILLS, CIRCULAR SAWS AND METALWORKING MACHINE TOOLS; ELECTRICAL UTILITY AND BATTERY-OPERATED MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS FOR THE CUTTING AND FORMING OF MATERIALS; ELECTRICAL UTILITY AND BATTERY-OPERATED MOTORS, NAMELY, MOTORS FOR POWER TOOLS AND MACHINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 4, 2003 |
| 009 | ELECTRONIC LOCKS WITH PROGRAMMABLE LOCKING FEATURES FOR USE IN CONTROLLING THE USE OR ACCESS TO A WIDE VARIETY OF ELECTRICAL OR ELECTRONIC DEVICES, FOR INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL AND HOME USE, INCLUDING POWER TOOLS, COMPUTERS, INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT, ENTERTAINMENT EQUIPMENT, CELL PHONES, AND FOR THE USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRICAL OR ELECTRONIC DEVICES WHERE SECURED ACCESS IS DESIRED; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE AS A LOCKING MECHANISM IN PREVENTING UNAUTHORIZED USE OF FINISHED ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 4, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by World Wide Innovations, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by World Wide Innovations, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by World Wide Innovations, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TECH-LOCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2004 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |