USPTO serial 78222036
FLEETSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLEETSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bedfordshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TERESA C. TUCKER
TERESA C TUCKER GROSSMAN, TUCKER, PERREAULT & PFLEGER, P55 S COMMERCIAL STMANCHESTER, NH 03101-2606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR PROVIDING VISUALLY AND/OR AURALLY INFORMATION ABOUT INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR PROVIDING VISUALLY AND/OR AURALLY INFORMATION ABOUT THE LOCATIONS, ROUTES AND SPEEDS OF INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS LOCATABLE IN VEHICLE INTERIORS FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION VISUALLY AND/OR AURALLY; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR MONITORING INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; EQUIPMENT AND CONTROL CENTERS FOR MONITORING AND COMMUNICATING WITH INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR PROVIDING VISUALLY AND/OR AURALLY INFORMATION ABOUT INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR PROVIDING VISUALLY AND/OR AURALLY INFORMATION ABOUT THE LOCATIONS, ROUTES AND SPEEDS OF INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS LOCATABLE IN VEHICLE INTERIORS FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION VISUALLY AND/OR AURALLY; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR MONITORING INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; EQUIPMENT AND CONTROL CENTERS FOR MONITORING AND COMMUNICATING WITH INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | PROVISION OF INFORMATION ABOUT INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; PROVISION OF INFORMATION ABOUT THE LOCATIONS, ROUTES AND SPEEDS OF INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; MONITORING OF INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; MONITORING OF LOCATIONS, ROUTES AND SPEEDS OF INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; PROVISION OF INFORMATION ABOUT INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; PROVISION OF INFORMATION ABOUT THE LOCATIONS, ROUTES AND SPEEDS OF INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; MONITORING OF INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES; MONITORING OF LOCATIONS, ROUTES AND SPEEDS OF INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |