Drawing for DIRECTPROOF

USPTO serial 78222405

DIRECTPROOF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIRECTPROOF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Muraff

JAMES P MURAFF311 S WACKER DR FL 53CHICAGO, IL 60606-6627UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for tracking, archiving and warehousing digital images throughout the pre-press and printing process, and manuals for the software that are distributed together therewith.ACTIVE
035Administrative services, namely, database management for asset and data population management.ACTIVE
042Computer services, namely providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for tracking, archiving and warehousing digital images throughout the pre-press and printing process; computer consulting services; computer system technical support namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems, monitoring of network systems, providing back-up computer programs and facilities, and providing on-site and remote help desk services for assistance with computer hardware and software; computer software design for others; computer software customization services for othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 5, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 4, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance