USPTO serial 78222753
EZ-TEMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EZ-TEMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel G. Mackas
DANIEL G MACKAS MCCORMICK, PAULDING & HUBER LLPCITYPLACE II 185 ASYLUM STHARTFORD CT, 06103U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Control to be mounted to a water heater, boiler or furnace to control the operating temperature of the appliance by cycling power to an oil or gas burner at the appropriate time | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |