Drawing for ODP

USPTO serial 78222793

ODP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ODP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Ehrlich

DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK NY, 10017U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical digital measuring systems sold as a unit for measuring critical dimensions,profile and film thickness in semiconductor manufacturing, comprising, namely, an electric light source, a spectroscopic elipsometry, reflectometry, computer hardware, critical dimensions metrology software and, profile and thickness semiconductor measurement softwareACTIVE—
037Repair, installation and maintenance of measuring apparatus; repair, installation and maintenance of computers, including CPU and peripheral equipmentACTIVE—
042Consulting services relating to semiconductor manufacturing apparatus and flat panel display manufacturing apparatus; consulting services relating to operational and functional aspects of optical measuring machines and apparatus for measuring film thickness and size and shape of wafers, and for particle inspection; repair, installation and maintenance of computer programs and softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 21, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 11, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 16, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 15, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 22, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 8, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2003AMPXAPPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION—
Jul 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance