USPTO serial 78223757
SCENT FOR SECRET PLACES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCENT FOR SECRET PLACES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sanjiv Sarwate
SANJIV SARWATE PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO IL, 60606U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes, cosmetics, semi-liquid and powder makeup, foundation, concealer, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, lipstick, lip liner, lip glosses, rouge and blusher and carrying case thereof soaps, shampoos, colognes, talcum powder, face creams, face packs, skin lotions, lip creams, make-up base, skin cleansing preparations, body washes, hand creams, foot creams, hand balms, foot balms, massage balms, massage creams, face powder, bath powder, eyebrow pencils, nail care preparations, namely, nail color, nail polish, nail polish removers and cuticle coat, bath salts bubble baths and bath oils, not for medical purposes, shower gels, hair care preparations, namely, shampoos, rinse, conditioners, lotions, hair creams, hair dyes, sprays, gels and mousses, perfumery, deodorants, anti-perspirants, suntan and sun screening preparations, shaving preparations, toilet waters, eau de colognes, body sprays, massage oils and aromatherapy oils, incense sticks, mouth washes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |