Drawing for 911 PACK

USPTO serial 78224249

911 PACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 911 PACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brent D. Sanders

BRENT D SANDERS PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE WA, 98101U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005FIRST AID KITS; SURVIVAL KITS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEDICATION, BASIC TOOLS, MEDICAL SUPPLIES AND BOOKS AND PRINTED MATERIALS PERTAINING TO FIRST AID AND SURVIVALACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 22, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance