USPTO serial 78224923
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CP 05100 Mexico City, MX
CP 05100 Mexico City, MX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edwin S. Flores
EDWIN S FLORES CHALKER FLORES, LLP12700 PARK CENTRAL DR STE 455DALLAS, TX 75251-1509UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Bacon; Bacon rinds; Beef; Blood sausage; Bologna; Bouillon; Broth; Caviar; Charcuterie; Cheese; Cheese and cracker combinations; Cheese fondue; Cheese food; Cheese spreads; Cheese substitutes; Cured Ham, Foie gras; Frankfurters; Ham; Hamburger; Hot dogs; Liver paste; Luncheon meats; Pork; Porkrinds; Salami; Salmon; Sardines; Sausages; Tripe; Tunafish; Turkey; Veal | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |