USPTO serial 78225099
4 COLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 4 COLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec H4S 1R8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald T. Shekleton
GERALD T SHEKLETON WELSH & KATZ, LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ 22ND FLCHICAGO IL, 60606U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SKI JACKETS, SKI PANTS, SKI SUITS, OUTERWEAR JACKETS, OUTERWEAR PANTS, OUTERWEAR SUITS, SNOWBOARD JACKETS, SNOWBOARD PANTS, SNOWBOARD SUITS, FLEECE JACKETS, FLEECE TOPS, FLEECE PANTS, SWEATERS, GLOVES, MITTENS AND HATS | ACTIVE | Oct 24, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |