Drawing for NEXTEL ICONNECT

USPTO serial 78225219

NEXTEL ICONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPKINS, TRICIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXTEL ICONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PHILIP T BESIROF

EDWARD W GRAY JR MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 5500WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1888UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Equipment used in providing telecommunications services, namely, mobile radios, two-way radios, cellular telephones, digital cellular telephones, mobile telephones, dispatch radios, radio pagers, mobile dispatch radios, mobile data receivers, electronic handheld units for the wireless receipt and/or transmission of voice, data, video and pictures, namely, handheld personal computers and digital assistants (PDAs); hardware and software for use in communications networks, namely, software and Internet protocol and telecommunications network transmitters, receivers, converters, and routers which allow the user to send voice, data, pictures, music and video over wireless networksACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, pictures, music and video via wireless networks; two-way radio dispatching services; electronic transmission of voice, text, images, data and information by means of two-way radios, mobile radios, cellular telephones, handheld units, namely, personal computers and digital assistants (PDAs), digital cellular telephones, mobile telephones, dispatch radios, pagers; paging services; mobile telephone communication services; wireless Internet access services; and wireless data services for mobile devices via a wireless network for the purpose of sending and receiving electronic mail, facsimiles, data, images, information, text, numeric messaging and text messaging and for accessing a global communications networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2004FAXXFAX SENT—
Sep 28, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 9, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 21, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance