USPTO serial 78225550
AFC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AFC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | A skid mounted proportional blending system for mixing any two gases to a specific ratio, based on flow measurement of the two gases via flow meters that are integral to the skid | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |