Drawing for 1 2 3 4 5 6 CT CT I.D.

USPTO serial 78225626

1 2 3 4 5 6 CT CT I.D.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with 1 2 3 4 5 6 CT CT I.D.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacy L. Taylor

STACY L TAYLOR FOLEY & LARDNERPO BOX 80278SAN DIEGO CA, 92138 0278U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010display receptacles for multiple immunoassay test strips for use in medical, research and analytical testing of biological fluids for the presence of certain solutes thereinACTIVEJul 2, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 21, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 8, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 27, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 30, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance