USPTO serial 78225821
NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF QUALITY PRINTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF QUALITY PRINTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. Kasicky
PAUL A KASICKY DKW LAW GROUP, PCUS STEEL BLDG 600 GRANT ST 58PITTSBURGH PA, 15219U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data in the field of printing | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper goods and printed matter, namely, guides, pricing guide, pricing standards, instructional and training manuals, and materials, books, reports, teaching and educational materials and publication paper, surveys and studies in the field of printing | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Arranging and conducting business meetings, conferences, conventions in the field of printing; group purchasing, namely buying clubs and functioning as purchasing agents, and conducting business research; market and sales research; operation and procedural research; and equipment and technical research; for and about small printers | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Providing Internet web site featuring printing information and other multimedia materials resources in the nature of surveys, studies, videos, CD's, DVD's and interactive computer programs in the field of printing | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Publication of books, magazines, surveys, plans, programs, studies, videos, CD's, DVD's and interactive computer programs in the field of printing; training services in the field of printing including education of persons, related materials, books and reports, educational services, namely, conducting seminars and/or courses in the field of printing leading to certification of individuals as well as courses leading to the granting of college credits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Crouser & Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF QUALITY PRINTERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2004 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |