USPTO serial 78226369
BONECHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BONECHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Abingdon, Oxfordshire, GB
Abingdon, Oxfordshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Ullman
JAMES A ULLMAN GREENBERG TRAURIG2375 E CAMELBACK RD STE 700PHOENIX AZ, 85016U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical preparations, namely, enzymes, labelled probes and oligonucleotides for use in analyzing proteins, DNA, messenger RNA, RNA; products for the separation, detection, measurement and analysis of proteins, and for the isolation and production of recombinants, namely, chemical buffer solutions and nucleic acid resolving materials; all for industrial, agricultural, environmental and food purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Antibodies, proteins and peptides for medical use in detecting, analyzing and measuring proteins; pharmaceutical and biochemical substances and preparations, namely, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of osteoporosis, disease relating to altered bone mineral density, altered bone strength, bone damage, bone disorders and bone diseases; vaccines; protein conjugates; diagnostic and analytical preparations for medical and veterinary use; diagnostic and prognostic products for medical purposes, namely, medical diagnostic reagents | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Apparatus and instruments for diagnostic and therapeutic research, namely, MRI, ultrasound, DEXA scanner X ray, diagnostic apparatus and diagnostic chips; display apparatus, namely, multi-well plates and arrays for diagnosis and analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Biotechnology testing services; quality control services for others in pharmaceuticals; technical research and development in the field of biotechnology | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical and surgical services; osteoporosis diagnostic and prognostic services; medical counseling in the nature of information and advice in the fields of medicine and surgery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oxagen Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Oxagen Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BONECHIP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |