USPTO serial 78226393
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Toppings for topping and mixing into ice cream and yogurt, namely fruit topping, nut topping and whipped topping. | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Frozen yogurt; ice cream; frozen yogurt and ice cream based confections; flavored ices; smoothies; shakes; cones for yogurt and ice cream; toppings for topping and mixing into ice cream and yogurt namely, candy topping, cookie topping and chocolate topping; and beverages, namely coffee, cappuccino, expresso, cafe au lait, cafe mocha and hot chocolate. | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Smoothies; fruit drinks and lemonade. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |