USPTO serial 78226412
FOUR SEASONS CENTRE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOUR SEASONS CENTRE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M3C 2K8, CA
Toronto, Ontario M3C 2K8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauren J. Mandell
J ALLISON STRICKLAND FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | audio and audiovisual recordings, featuring music | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Four Seasons Hotels Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Four Seasons Hotels Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named FOUR SEASONS CENTRE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |