Drawing for LINCO-JECT

USPTO serial 78226420

LINCO-JECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3032803Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 20, 2005
Examiner
LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LINCO-JECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Laubscher, Jr.

LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER JR LAW OFFICE OF LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER JR1160 SPA RD STE 2BANNAPOLIS, MD 21403-1099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005antibiotics for use in animal health careSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJul 21, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2007C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 20, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 9, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 10, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 1, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 1, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 1, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance