Drawing for FLASHBACK PRICING

USPTO serial 78226526

FLASHBACK PRICING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLASHBACK PRICING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749555 17TH ST STE 3200DENVER, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING PRICE COMPARISONS BETWEEN PRESENT AND PASTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 20, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 3, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 30, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 2, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2003PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance