USPTO serial 78226553
MICROFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda Pecchioni Thompson
JULIA SPOOR GARD BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal spring-loaded, gear-driven clamps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |