USPTO serial 78226799
FLOSS 'N' CAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLOSS 'N' CAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Sidoti
PASQUALE A RAZZANO FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCHEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Oral care kit consisting primarily of toothpaste and also containing dental floss | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |