USPTO serial 78226885
WONDER KNITTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WONDER KNITTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Costellia
JEFFREY L COSTELLIA NIXON PEABODY LLP8180 GREENSBORO DR STE 800MCLEAN VA, 22102U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | HANDICRAFT IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, KNITTING KNOBBY FOR KNITTING CORDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2005 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 1, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 1, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |