Drawing for ESTIME

USPTO serial 78226943

ESTIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESTIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, medicines, liquids, supplements, creams, solutions and ointments for the treatment of dry skin and sun-damaged skin; topical ointment used as a dressing and protectant for wounds, burns, abrasions and cutaneous ulcers; pharmaceutical preparations for skin care, namely, treatment of skin disorders; biological diagnostic preparations for medical purposes; biological antioxidants for medical use, namely, food supplements; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, namely, dietary supplements; medicinal herbs, namely, medicinal herbs in dried or preserved form and medicinal herb extracts; medicinal drinks, namely, dietary supplemental drinks; food ingredients and additives for medical use, namely, dietary food supplements and dietary drinks mix for use as a meal replacementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 27, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 3, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance