Drawing for LUCIA DE MENDOZA

USPTO serial 78227129

LUCIA DE MENDOZA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUCIA DE MENDOZA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 2, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 4, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 30, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 30, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 2, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance