Drawing for ON THE GO

USPTO serial 78227234

ON THE GO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ON THE GO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

F. Brad Salcedo

F BRAD SALCEDO TYCO PLASTICS SERVICES AGBAHNHOFSTRASSE 29PO BOX 1571SCHAFFHAUSEN, 8200

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PLASTIC DISPOSABLE TRASH BAGSACTIVEAug 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 16, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 28, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 28, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 20, 2004GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 5, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 5, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance