USPTO serial 78227281
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Productos Plastiapan S.A. de C.V.
Apan, Hidalgo, MX
Productos Plastiapan S.A. de C.V.
Apan, Hidalgo, MX
Productos Plastiapan, S.A. de C.V.
Apan, Hidalgo, MX
Other trademarks owned by Productos Plastiapan, S.A. de C.V.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAUREL V. DINEFF
JUSTIN R. YOUNG DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | BATH SPONGES, CLEANING SPONGES, SPONGES FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, FLOOR BRUSHES, CLOTHES BRUSHES, COSMETIC BRUSHES, DUSTING BRUSHES, HAIR BRUSHES, HAIR COMBS, CLEANING CLOTHS, CLEANING PADS, CLEANING RAGS, STEEL WOOL FOR CLEANING, UNWROUGHT GLASS, UNFINISHED GLASS FOR VEHICLES; AND CONTAINERS FOR FOODS, BEVERAGE WARE, NAPKIN HOLDERS, SALT CELLARS AND BASKETS, ALL MADE OF PLASTIC | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |