USPTO serial 78227779
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED VEGETABLES AND FRUITS; MEAT; POULTRY; GAME; FISH; SEAFOOD; MEAT EXTRACTS; SOUPS; JELLIES; PASTES, NAMELY, ANCHOVY, ARTICHOKE, FRUIT, GUAVA, LIVER, MEAT, TOMATO, VEGETABLE; FRUIT PRESERVES; FROZEN, PREPARED OR PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLES; JAMS; EGGS; YOGURT, CHEESE AND MILK SUBSTITUTES; SOY MILK AND SOY-BASED FOOD BEVERAGE USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE; EDIBLE OILS AND FATS; PROTEIN FOR USE AS A FOOD ADDITIVE | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | COFFEE, COFFEE EXTRACTS AND NON-ALCOHOLIC COFFEE-BASED BEVERAGES; COFFEE SUBSTITUTES AND EXTRACTS OF COFFEE SUBSTITUTES; TEA, TEA EXTRACTS AND NON-ALCOHOLIC TEA-BASED BEVERAGES; COCOA AND NON-ALCOHOLIC COCOA-BASED BEVERAGES; CHOCOLATE; CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY, CANDY; SUGAR; NATURAL SWEETENERS; BAKERY DESSERTS; BREAD; YEAST; PASTRY; BISCUITS; CAKES; FROZEN DESSERTS, NAMELY, ICE MILK AND FRUIT ICE; PUDDINGS; ICE CREAM; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING ICE CREAM, NAMELY, SALTED AND SWEETENED POWDERED OR LIQUID MIXES, FOOD FLAVORING AND SUGAR; HONEY AND NATURAL HONEY SUBSTITUTES; BREAKFAST CEREALS; RICE; PASTA; CEREAL-BASED SNACK FOODS; RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS; GRAIN-BASED SNACK BARS; GRANOLA-BASED SNACK BARS; FROZEN, PREPARED OR PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF RICE OR PASTA; SAUCES; SEASONINGS; SALAD DRESSINGS; MAYONNAISE | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | BEERS; MINERAL WATERS, FRUIT PUNCH, AND NON-ALCOHOLIC, NON-CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS; SYRUPS, EXTRACTS AND ESSENCES FOR MAKING NON-ALCOHOLIC, NON-CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS; FRUIT JUICES; VEGETABLE JUICES; FERMENTED SOFT DRINKS CONTAINING LACTIC ACID | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2006 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |