USPTO serial 78227879
KANSAS LAND & CATTLE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2900935Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 2004
- Examiner
- HOWARD, CHERYL L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KANSAS LAND & CATTLE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seth W. Black
Seth W. Black KELLER JOLLEY & PREECE1010 North 500 EastSuite 210North Salt Lake, UT 84054Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | beef | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kansas City Steak Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Kansas City Steak Company, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named KANSAS LAND & CATTLE COMPANY
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |