USPTO serial 78227930
GUARDIAN ANGEL PLAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GUARDIAN ANGEL PLAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol H. Peters
CAROL H PETERS MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY ET ALONE FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed forms, namely, life and accident insurance policies | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |