USPTO serial 78227944
GRIPPING EYEWEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3072247Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2006
- Examiner
- GEORGE, DAHLIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GRIPPING EYEWEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jan K. Simpson
JAN K SIMPSON FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP1301 MCKINNEY STE 5100HOUSTON, TX 77010-3095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Eyewear, namely ophthalmic frames, eyeglasses, sunglasses, auxiliary eyeglasses attachments, namely, auxiliary lenses that attach with magnets, clips, or any other means, and sunglasses lens attachments, namely, auxiliary lenses that attach with magnets, clips, or any other means | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 3, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |