Drawing for TOOTHWELDING

USPTO serial 78227963

TOOTHWELDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEPHENS, SONYA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TOOTHWELDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen A. Hill

STEPHEN A HILL RANKIN, HILL, PORTER & CLARK LLP925 EUCLID AVE STE 700CLEVELAND OH, 44115 1405U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dental filling compounds containing plastic, namely, dental amalgams; plastic films and granulates for dental use preformed fillings for teeth, dental adhesives, dental putty, dental cement, dental veneersACTIVE—
010Dental implants, dental pins for securing pre-existing dentures], dentures, dental crowns, dental bridges, dental inlays, dental onlays; electrical devices for attaching dental fixtures to teeth, consisting of handheld tools comprising ultrasonic generators and transducers; dental apparatus and instruments for introduction of tooth implants and elements for endodontic repair and for preparing tooth implants or elements for endodontic repair, namely, burrs, oral irrigators, picks, mirrors, dental handpieces, dental forceps, filling instruments, dental files, dental probes, dental scalers; dental clips and braces for securing dental correction elements; dental capsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance