USPTO serial 78227963
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen A. Hill
STEPHEN A HILL RANKIN, HILL, PORTER & CLARK LLP925 EUCLID AVE STE 700CLEVELAND OH, 44115 1405U.S. ARMY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dental filling compounds containing plastic, namely, dental amalgams; plastic films and granulates for dental use preformed fillings for teeth, dental adhesives, dental putty, dental cement, dental veneers | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Dental implants, dental pins for securing pre-existing dentures], dentures, dental crowns, dental bridges, dental inlays, dental onlays; electrical devices for attaching dental fixtures to teeth, consisting of handheld tools comprising ultrasonic generators and transducers; dental apparatus and instruments for introduction of tooth implants and elements for endodontic repair and for preparing tooth implants or elements for endodontic repair, namely, burrs, oral irrigators, picks, mirrors, dental handpieces, dental forceps, filling instruments, dental files, dental probes, dental scalers; dental clips and braces for securing dental correction elements; dental caps | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |