USPTO serial 78228164
NEXMIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEXMIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Springfield, VA
Springfield, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 SLATERS LN FOURTH FLALEXANDRIA VA, 22314 1176U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DATA INTEGRATION, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER NETWORK OPERATIONS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL AND LOCAL AGENCIES NAMELY, THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTEGRATED RANGE INSTALLATION, MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE ASSIMILATION OF INFORMATION FROM DISPARATE DATA SOURCES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTEGRATION OF LEGACY COMPUTER SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE INTEROPERABILITY WITH EXISTING COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER DATABASES IN A STANDARD FORMAT, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING REPORTS THAT ARE CONFIGURABLE, EXTENSIBLE AND BROWSER-ACCESSIBLE, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTEGRATION OF EXISTING DATABASES WITHOUT MODIFICATION OF EXISTING DATABASE SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION; COMPUTER DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES; COMPUTER NETWORK DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY CREATING INDEXES OF INFORMATION, SITES AND OTHER RESOURCES AVAILABLE ON COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER NETWORKS; INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MONITORING THE COMPUTER SYSTEMS OF OTHERS FOR TECHNICAL PURPOSES AND PROVIDING BACK-UP COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS; UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |