USPTO serial 78228328
FRESH ORGANICS THE REAL FOOD COMPANY NEIGHBORHOOD NATURAL MARKETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRESH ORGANICS THE REAL FOOD COMPANY NEIGHBORHOOD NATURAL MARKETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley E. Soper and Alison Pitt
Stanley E. Soper and Alison Pitt Nutraceutical Corporation1400 KEARNS BLVD FL 2PARK CITY, UT 84060-7228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Veggie burger patties; packaged bulk foods namely bulk dried fruit, bulk processed nuts; marinated vegetables; freeze dried vegetables; dried fruit and vegetable chips; olive oil; milk; eggs; butter; canned vegetables; potato chips; cream cheese; vegetable-based spreads; fruit preserves; marmalade; processed fruit; dried fruit; preserved fruit; cooked fruit; dried vegetables; cooked vegetables; preserved vegetables; dried prunes; raisins; roasted nuts; cut vegetable sesame sticks; potato sticks; cut spinach sticks; cut onion sticks; cut vegetable sticks; vegetable sesame stick snacks; spinach stick snacks, onion stick snacks; vegetable stick snacks; trail mix consisting primarily of processed nuts and fruit; processed dates; processed soy beans; soy products, namely, dried soybeans, soy chips, soy nuts; dried soy drink mixes used as a milk substitute; yogurt; frozen fruit; frozen vegetables; soy based milk beverage used as a milk substitute; cheese; peanut butter; processed olives; soups; frozen French fried potatoes; cooking oil spray; fruit based spreads; canned fruits; processed beans; processed currants; lentils; processed kelp; dried figs; powdered milk for food purposes; formed textured vegetable protein to be used as an extender or meat substitute; processed edible seeds; hummus; cut fresh vegetables; canned tomatoes; canned tomato paste; processed edible beans and seeds; processed edible alfalfa seed; processed edible flax seed; processed edible poppy seed; baba ghannouj; jellies; jams; fruit sauces, namely applesauce and cranberry sauce; edible oils and fats; processed edible quinoa seeds; frozen boxed dinners consisting primarily of meat, poultry or vegetables; meat; poultry; meat extracts; all aforementioned organically sourced | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Processed cereals; processed grains; cereal-based food bar and snack foods; rice-based food bars and snack foods; wheat-based food bars and snack foods; grain-based food bars and snack foods; granola-based food bars and snack foods; pasta sauce; salsa; tortilla chips; pizzas; bulk candy; pretzels; mayonnaise; coffee beans; cookies; waffles; maple syrup; ketchup; corn and flour tortillas; pasta; bread; focaccia bread; chocolate; pies; iced tea; popped popcorn; processed corn snacks, namely puffed corn snacks; buns; mustard; coffee; tea; cocoa; barbecue sauce; pesto sauce; macaroni; fructose; wheat germ; crackers; spices; granola; sugar; rice; breadcrumbs; flour; mixes for making bakery goods; processed herbs for cooking; frozen pasta; cookie dough; frozen yogurt; ice cream; frozen boxed dinners consisting primarily of pasta or rice; cut corn sticks; corn stick snacks; rice based snacks; muesli; tomato sauce; processed millet grain; husked barley; arrowroot powder; processed wheat berries as grain; processed rye berries as grain; bulk dried spices; honey; vinegar; all aforementioned organically sourced; salt | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruits and vegetables; living natural plants and live flowers; unprocessed cereals; unprocessed herbs; unprocessed beans; unprocessed rice; unprocessed grains for eating; pet food; unpopped popcorn; bulk fresh nuts; raw nuts; fresh prunes; unprocessed eda-mame; unprocessed amaranth; all aforementioned organically sourced | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juice; vegetable juice; fruit drinks; vegetable drinks; apple juice; orange juice; cranberry juice; grapefruit juice; fruit juice concentrates; vegetable juice concentrates; fruit flavored soft drinks; preparations for making fruit drink beverages and soy based fruit drink beverages; dried soy drink mixes not used as a milk substitute; beer; carbonated soft drinks; non-carbonated soft drinks; sport drinks; all aforementioned made with organically sourced materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wines, from organically sourced grapes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail health food store services with organic foods and produce; retail bakery shops with organic foods and produce | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fresh Organics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fresh Organics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named FRESH ORGANICS THE REAL FOOD COMPANY NEIGHBORHOOD NATURAL MARKETS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |