USPTO serial 78228403
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chie-Young Chyung
CHIE-YOUNG CHYUNG LAW OFFICE OF CHIE-YOUNG CHYUNG1550 MADRUGA AVE STE 415CORAL GABLES FL U, SA 33146-3019,| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics skin care products, namely, skin lotion, skin cleansing lotion, facial lotion; creams, namely, body cream, skin cream, vanishing cream; skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; skin soap | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |