USPTO serial 78228569
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William D. O'Neill
WILLIAM D ONEILL SENNIGER POWERS LEAVITT & ROEDELONE METROPOLITAN SQ 16TH FLST LOUIS MO, 63102U.S. ARMY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Silicon wafers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |