USPTO serial 78228616
MEDACOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDACOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
College Station, TX
College Station, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional supplements | ABANDONED | Feb 27, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |