USPTO serial 78228729
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jere M. Webb
JERE M WEBB STOEL RIVES LLP900 SW 5TH AVE STE 2600PORTLAND, OR 97204-1268UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | DIAMONDS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 2, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |