Drawing for DOCTOR WOOFF & NURSE MEOW

USPTO serial 78228733

DOCTOR WOOFF & NURSE MEOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOCTOR WOOFF & NURSE MEOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathaniel R. Huckel-Bauer

Nathaniel R. Huckel-Bauer Drummond & Drummond, LLPOne Monument WayPortland, ME 04101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005veterinary preparations for cats, dogs, horses, sheep, cows, birds, hamsters and snakes.ACTIVE—
009prerecorded audio and video tapes featuring education and instruction on the proper care and treatment of animals and compact discs featuring education and instruction on the proper care and treatment of animals; videogame tape cassettesACTIVE—
016printed instructional materials in the field of pet care and children's story books featuring education and instruction on the proper care and treatment of animalsACTIVE—
028pet toysACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, meetings and workshops in the field of pet care and entertainment in the nature of a television series for children and movies regarding the ethical care and treatment of animalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 1, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 27, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 1, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
May 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 18, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 6, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 8, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance